Instructing Ian Stern KC
To instruct Ian or for any further information please contact our clerks.
Clerk: John Grimmer
Telephone: +44 (0)7776 154 664
Email: Click here
Ian Stern KC, Head of Chambers Regulatory team, is recommended as a ‘leader in the field’ by Chambers & Partners, an independent guide to the legal profession.
In 2014, Ian was named “Professional Discipline Silk of the Year” by Chambers & Partners.
Ian is often instructed to give an opinion in relation to the merits of an appeal from a finding by a professional regulatory body where he has not conducted the initial hearing. If the appeal proceeds he drafts all the necessary documents and conducts the High Court appeal.
W v GDC
Conducted the appeal on behalf of the regulator. Appeal dismissed.
V v GOC
Conducted the appeal for the registrant. Appeal allowed.
A v GMC
Conducted the appeal against sanction on behalf of the registrant – appeal refused.
Ian has been at the forefront of significant and high profile Inquests over a number of years. He has represented financial institutions, doctors and specialist firearms officers.
Mark Duggan
The death that started the London riots in 2011. At the Inquest which ended in 2014 Ian represented the specialist firearms officers.
Re GB (deceased)
Represented a doctor at a six week Inquest. Wide variety of issues of care dealt with.
Stockwell Inquest
Represented the armed officers who fired the fatal shots that killed Jean Charles de Menezes.
Chandler's Ford
Represented two Specialist Firearms Officers who fatally shot two armed robbers.
R
Represented a surgeon who had carried out an operation that led to the death of the patient.
R v M
Represented a solicitor in Northern Ireland at trial who faced 70 counts in relation to various significant frauds. Fifty one counts were stopped by the High Court Judge following extensive legal arguments.
Company 'A'
Advised a company on money laundering in relation to a SOCA investigation.
R v W
Allegations of money laundering. Significant cash holdings. Not guilty.
Judicial review proceedings are a regular adjunct to the cases in which Ian is involved.
Mark Duggan
Pamela Duggan’s judicial review of the inquest decision in relation to her son [2014] EWHC 3343 (Admin).
Ian often uses his considerable advocacy skills to represent those involved in serious crime including allegations of murder.
R v F
Allegation of murder in relation to a gang shooting. Not guilty.
R v R
Allegation of attempted murder. The prosecution alleged that the D had fired three shots at a woman when she opened her front door to him as a result of a grievance between him and the woman’s son. Not guilty.
In 2014, Ian was named “Professional Discipline Silk of the Year” by Chambers & Partners.
'Plebgate'
Advised and conducted the ‘Plebgate’ misconduct hearings on behalf of the MPS.
GDC v A
Conducted case on behalf of the regulator involving a series of allegations.
GDC v F
Acted on behalf of the registrant.
GMP v C
Represented a police officer who faced misconduct proceedings before Manchester Police.
CIPFA v M
Represented a CFO before his accountancy body.
MC v Prof R
A three week hearing representing a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon who was alleged to have failed to provide good clinical care to a patient who died during an operation. All allegations not proved.
GMC v S
Sexual allegations by a nurse against a doctor. Allegations found not proved.
RE v C
Written advices to a Hong Kong accountant on disciplinary proceedings. Case compromised.
GOC v P
Clinical allegations regarding sight test of children. Case dismissed following cross examination of the expert for the Council and submissions at the close of the case for the Council.
GMC v K
Represented doctor following his conviction at the Crown Court where a suspended prison sentence was imposed. Following a 5 day hearing at the GMC, the Panel agreed that undertakings were sufficient.