Instructing Natalie Bird
To instruct Natalie or for any further information please contact our clerks.
Clerk: John Grimmer
Telephone: +44 (0)7776 154 664
Email: Click here
Natalie Bird prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court, Youth Court, and Magistrates’ Court on a wide range of criminal matters, including trial advocacy, sentences, and confiscation proceedings. She acted as disclosure counsel to the Crown in the high-profile CCRC reference of Peter Tredget, in which the Crown successfully resisted an appeal against conviction regarding 12 counts of manslaughter through numerous arsons dating back to the 1970s.
Natalie has a particular interest in fraud and economic crime which has been developing since her pre-pupillage year as a paralegal within Norton Rose Fulbright’s white collar crime team. Since gaining tenancy with 2 Bedford Row in March 2018, Natalie has assisted with investigations led by the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority, the Serious Fraud Office, and The Pensions Regulator. She is also on the SFO’s C Panel of Counsel and is a Committee Member of the Young Fraud Lawyers Association.
In addition to her criminal practice, Natalie regularly appears for healthcare regulators and regulated professionals in fitness to practise proceedings. Her experience in this field stems from her 8-month post-pupillage secondment with the Association of Optometrists in 2018, during which she managed a large number of cases and drafted representations to Case Examiners. Ever since, Natalie has case-presented as well as defended in a vast array of regulatory proceedings, including interim order hearings (including applications to the High Court to extend the order), substantive hearings, review hearings, and restoration hearings.
Natalie is a CPS Level 2 Prosecutor, prosecuting in the Crown Court, Youth Court, and Magistrates’ Court in trial and POCA proceedings. Off-panel, Natalie successfully prosecuted a wounding with intent jury trial in January 2022.
In 2020-late 2021, Natalie acted as Disclosure Counsel to the Crown in the high profile CCRC reference of Peter Tredget, in which the Crown successfully resisted an appeal against conviction regarding 12 counts of manslaughter through numerous arsons dating back to the 1970s. For more information please click here: https://www.2bedfordrow.co.uk/natalie-bird-acted-as-disclosure-counsel-for-the-crown-in-the-recent-court-of-appeal-case-of-r-v-tredget-2022-ewca-crim-108%e2%80%8b/
Natalie is also on the SFO’s C Panel and has a particular interest in fraud and economic crime, having completed secondments with the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority, assisting with and advising on investigations into banks and insurance companies. In 2021 she was instructed by the CPS and HMRC in a VAT and Corporation Tax evasion case involving losses totalling nearly £400,000 – following her comprehensive review of hundreds of pages of evidence and financial reporting, Natalie drafted an Indictment to which the Defendant pleaded Guilty in full.
Natalie regularly defends in the Crown Court, Youth Court, and Magistrates’ Court, including trial advocacy, sentences, and confiscation proceedings.
A few months after successfully completing her pupillage with 2 Bedford Row, Natalie was led by former Head of Chambers Bill Clegg QC in a two-week trial regarding domestic violence and controlling and coercive behaviour, resulting in the client being acquitted of all charges. Since then, Natalie has represented many Defendants at trial in the Crown Court in her own right – please see the list below for some examples. She has a particular interest in fraud and economic crime, and is building a practice within the field of health & safety.
Natalie welcomes all manner of instructions through solicitors as well as directly from lay clients. For example, Natalie has provided a lay client with direct access advice regarding potential bribery whistleblowing, and she has secured an acquittal for a working mother accused of keying her neighbours’ cars.
Natalie regularly appears for healthcare regulators and regulated professionals in fitness to practise proceedings. Her experience in this field stems from her 8-month post-pupillage secondment with the Association of Optometrists in 2018, during which she managed a large number of cases and drafted representations to Case Examiners.
Ever since, Natalie has case-presented as well as defended in a vast array of regulatory proceedings, including interim order hearings (including applications to the High Court to extend the order), substantive hearings, review hearings, and restoration hearings.
GOC v Z (2022)
Secured a short suspension (which was not extended at its conclusion) for a student optometrist who had admitted to posting a series of discriminatory Tweets.
GDC v H (2021)
Successfully opposed a former dentist’s application to be restored to the GDC Register, five years after he had been erased for dishonesty
GDC v D (2021)
Five-day substantive hearing involving contested expert evidence regarding a wide array of clinical allegations, all of which were found proven along with impaired fitness to practise.
GOC v P (2021):
Persuaded the Committee to find that an optometrist’s fitness to practise was not impaired, despite his admission of dishonesty having falsely denied slashing the tyres of a car which (unbeknownst to him at the time) belonged to his Practice Manager.
GOC v S (2020)
Successful Rule 16 application resulting in No Further Action being taken following an initial referral by the Case Examiners to the Fitness to Practise Committee for a substantive hearing.
GOC v C (2019)
All charges dropped after successful opposition of the GOC’s application to amend the charges and/or recall the complainant who, during cross-examination, had demonstrated confusion as to what symptoms they had allegedly reported during their eye examination with my client.
GOC v S (2019)
Conditions of practice order revoked, leading up to the substantive hearing relating to an investigation of dishonesty.
NHS England v C (2018)
Client’s conditions of practice were removed following a substantive finding by the GOC of sexual impropriety with a patient.