Stan is an experienced practitioner who has successfully defended clients in an array of high profile cases including the Graffs £40 million jewellery robbery and the M1 arson. He acted for the first defendant in a case involving a plot to commit an ‘honour’ killing using sulphuric acid, and was instructed as lead counsel for a defendant who was accused of successfully orchestrating the importation of machine guns from prison. Stan instructed as lead counsel, has also secured a stay as a result of an abuse of process for a man accused of conspiring to import millions of pounds worth of cocaine through a clearing agent in Heathrow.
Stan has advised and represented clients who are in the public eye such as footballers, musicians and substantial companies.
Stan’s practice includes defending in a wide spectrum of financial crime cases including:
- The mis-selling of investments charged as conspiracy to defraud or offences under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the Financial Services Act 2012;
- Large scale commercial or residential mortgage fraud;
- Tax fraud;
- Advance fee fraud; and
- International money laundering arrangements and breaches of the Money Laundering Regulations by businesses.
He has represented defendants prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Office, the Financial Conduct Authority, Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. Stan has advised clients from other jurisdictions on the Bribery Act and the Proceeds of Crime Act.
- FCA v AM (ongoing): Representing a company director who is a practicing doctor, being prosecuted by the FCA over the alleged mis-selling of shares in a primary healthcare company operating in Dubai.
- R v CS (ongoing): Lead Counsel for the first defendant accused of orchestrating a multi-million pound investment fraud relating to the sale of rare earth metals.
- R v LDC (2017): Represented a defendant in a highly publicised case in which LDC was accused of encouraging her mother to change her name by deed poll to commit an ‘audacious’ property fraud.
- R v JL (2016): Represented one of 15 defendants charged with conspiracy to defraud a mortgage lender of £40 million relating to the purchase of commercial properties.
- R v MG (2016): Represented a mortgage advisor who was one of 12 defendants accused of complicity in a multi-million pound conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud involving approximately 80 properties.
- R v S (2015): Lead Counsel in a case brought by HMRC against a VAT inspector and her husband accused of cheating the public revenue and mortgage fraud.
- R v I (2014): Successfully defended one of 11 defendants charged with money laundering designed to thwart confiscation proceedings.
- R v G (2014): Represented a company director who was one of 15 defendants accused of being involved in a money laundering arrangement relating to £35 million which was removed from the jurisdiction by a complex web of bank transfers and currency trades.
- R v M (2014): Represented a director of an escrow company who was accused of breaching the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 by transferring client money amounting to approximately £10 million which was alleged to have been obtained from MTIC fraud.
- R v E (2014): Represented an alleged money launderer of a multi-million pound advance fee fraud involving victims in the United States of America.
- R v A (2013): Successfully represented a company director who was cleared of conspiring to defraud HBOS.
- R v S (2013): Represented a defendant accused of involvement in a multi-million pound fine wine investment fraud.
- R v R (2013): Represented the only acquitted defendant in a multi-million pound ticketing fraud and associated money-laundering.
- R v B (2012): Dentist accused of conspiring to defraud the NHS cleared after the charge was stayed as a result of an abuse of process.
- R v I (2009): Successfully represented a solicitor accused of complicity in a mortgage fraud surrounding a £19 million property deal.
Stan regularly acts for defendants charged in large scale drugs conspiracies, and other organised crime such as armed robbery. He has considerable experience in representing clients accused of serious assault and offences involving the use and distribution of firearms with intent to endanger life.
- R v G (2016): Represented a defendant found in possession of a machine gun and ammunition who was already on life licence for murder.
- R v M (2015): Represented one of 19 defendants charged with offences arising from the commercial supply of firearms.
- R v JF (2015): Acted for a defendant accused of wounding with intent following a group attack on a male who nearly died.
- R v AM (2015): Lead Counsel for a defendant who orchestrated the importation of machine guns from HMP Wandsworth whilst serving an extend sentence of imprisonment.
- R v S (2014): Represented a defendant accused of participating in an armed robbery during which the victim was shot.
- R v A (2013): Lead Counsel for a defendant charged with conspiring to import over 100kgs of cocaine through a clearing agents in Heathrow. Successfully argued that the indictment should be stayed as a result of an abuse of process following a 5 month trial which was aborted at the close of the Prosecution case.
- R v CB (2012): Lead Counsel for a defendant acquitted of conspiracy to commit an arson which caused in excess of £4.5 million of damage to the M1 flyover at Apex Corner.
- R v M (2010): Successfully defended a client accused of conspiring to rob Graffs Diamonds of £40 million worth of jewellery following a successful submission of no case to answer.
- R v O (2009): Acted for a defendant acquitted of attempting to cause grievous bodily harm to a community support officer who had previously given evidence against him, by driving over him with a car.
- R v R (2009): Acted for a prison officer at Inner London Crown Court charged with misconduct in public office and conspiracy to supply controlled drugs to prisoners.
- R v G (2009): Represented a defendant who was acquitted of offences arising out of the kidnapping of a young male.
- R v H (2008): Lead Counsel for the first defendant charged with a conspiracy to rob encompassing 27 ‘carjackings’.
- R v L (2008): Represented a defendant charged with the kidnapping and torture of a 14 year old boy as a result of a dispute between rival gangs.
- R v B (2007): Acted for a 16 year old defendant in the ‘KG Tribe’ case. The defendant was alleged to have been a member of a ‘steaming’ gang responsible for 36 robberies on the underground and numerous stabbings of victims.
- R v W (2006): Represented an uncle of a former England international footballer, charged with conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office by corrupting a police officer to obtain information about an informant.
Murder & Manslaughter
- R v F (2016): Represented a youth accused of attempted murder following a group attack on a bus.
- R v C (2015): Represented a defendant charged with the attempted murder of his aunt. He was accused of repeatedly stabbing her to the neck and body without any provocation.
- R v O (2012): Represented a defendant charged with murder. The issue was whether he could have formed a specific intent whilst heavily intoxicated.
- R v J (2012): Represented a defendant charged with the murder of his sister-in-law. The Crown’s case was that he killed her and then set fire to the family home to conceal the offence in order to claim a £1 million life assurance payout with her husband.
- R v M (2011): Murder of a man in the car park of a public house.
- R v V (2010): Conspiracy to murder a man in an attempted ‘honour killing’ using sulphuric acid.
Serious Sexual Offences
Stan has represented clients accused of all manner of sexual offences including offences against vulnerable adults and children.
- R v P (2016): Represented a University Professor accused of serious sexual offences including attempted rape, against his best friend’s 8 year old daughter.
- R v JS (2015): Acted for a defendant alleged to have attacked one woman in a park and whilst on bail for that offence, raped a prostitute.
- R v (2012): ‘Archbishop’ and television personality alleged to have committed serious sexual offences against devout parishioners he promised to ‘heal’.
- R v H (2011): Represented a young defendant accused of attempting to rape his roommate’s friend when she was incapable of consenting due to intoxication.
- R v G (2009): 16 year old defendant acquitted of 6 counts of rape at knifepoint and one count of sexual activity with a child.
- R v S (2007): Acted for a defendant acquitted of rape.
- R v A (2006): Defendant accused of historic rape and indecent assault.
- R v O (2005): ‘Mayfair Madam’ case involving an allegation of controlling prostitution and earning at least £2.1 million pounds from criminal conduct.
Stan regularly advises on whether there are grounds to appeal against conviction and/or sentence when he was not instructed at trial. He has successfully represented such clients, as well as those he represented at first instance in the Court of Appeal in the numerous appeals he has been involved in.
- Attorney General’s References (Nos 128 to 141 of 2015 and Nos 8 to 10 of 2016) 2 Cr.App.R.(S) 12: Acted for a Respondent in the leading case on sentencing offences of transferring firearms.
- R v Ogden & Others  1 Cr.App.R. 29: Appeal against conviction relating to the meaning of “converting criminal property”. Represented 4 appellants. Successful appeal against sentence.
- R v Sulal : Appeal against conviction based on the admission of bad character evidence.
- R v Newell : Successful appeal against sentence in relation to offences of armed robbery and aggravated burglary.
- R v Loveridge  EWCA Crim 1209: Successful appeal against sentence in relation to a conspiracy to commit armed robbery.
- R v Stewart : Successful appeal against sentence for drugs and firearms offences.
- R v Jabbar  EWCA Crim 801: Acted as led junior in an appeal against conviction for murder based on the admission of hearsay evidence.
- R v CB : Prosecution appeal against a successful submission of no case to answer.
- R v Marsh  EWCA Crim 3190: Application of Sentencing Guidelines for offences of wounding.
- R v Bashier  EWCA Crim 2003: £1 million conspiracy to produce cannabis; Appeal against conviction and sentence.
- R v Kennedy  EWCA Crim 346: Successful appeal against sentence.
- R v Scilimati  EWCA 3247: Appeal against sentence for a conspiracy to burgle in excess of 90 properties
- R v Howard  EWCA 1748: Appeal against sentence for a conspiracy to rob.
- R v R  EWCA 265: Application for leave to appeal against sentence for false imprisonment.
- R v Phillips  EWCA 500 (appeared for the Respondent): Drug importation.
- R v Bees  EWCA 3438: Appeal against the imposition of detention for public protection for conspiracy to rob and two counts of wounding with intent.
- R v Armstrong  EWCA Crim 57: Appeal against conviction and sentence in a historical rape case. Both appeals allowed to an extent.
- R v Osobu  EWCA Crim 2369: Appeal against sentence for money laundering.
- Southwark Council v Peckham Hair and Beauty Ltd (2016): Acted for the company in a trading standards prosecution arising out of sales of prohibited cosmetics.
- Hertfordshire Council v Poundworld Retail Ltd (2015): Acted for the company in a trading standards prosecution relating to the sale of 100,000 defective high visibility jackets across the UK.
- Croydon Council v Poundstretcher Ltd (2015): Acted for the company in a trading standards prosecution.
Health & Safety
- O Ltd: Advised a substantial catering company being investigated for health and safety breaches at their principal business premises where food was prepared.
- R v Colin Kazim-Richards (2014): Acted for a Blackburn Rovers player charged with public order offence arising out of alleged homophobic gestures made towards Brighton and Hove Albion supporters at the AMEX Stadium during a Championship match.
Stan has advised and represented clients facing applications for confiscation orders for all types of financial crime. He has successfully argued disproportionality based on R v Waya principles, and with the assistance of expert forensic accountants, successfully challenged Prosecution calculations for both benefit and available amount in applications for multi-million pound orders.
- R v S (2017): Successfully argued that the £1.35 million order sought by the Prosecution be reduced to £37,000 following legal submissions on the calculation of benefit and proportionality.
- R v M (2016): Prosecution contention that benefit be assessed as £10 million reduced to £29,000 following representations on the relevant law.
- SFO v W (2015): Successfully applied to reduce two confiscation orders to nil under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 due to inadequacy. The argument centred on Spanish property and contract law.
- R v W (2015): Successfully argued for a substantial reduction to the Crown’s assessment of benefit and available amount at a contested hearing.
- FSA v AL (2012): Represented a defendant in a multi-million pound application for a confiscation order for an offence of insider trading to which both she and her husband had pleaded guilty.
- R v B (2009): Prosecution application for a confiscation order in the amount of £9 million reduced to £300,000 after representations made.
U v Secretary of State for the Home Department [ongoing]: Representing a religious organisation who assert that the Home Secretary’s decision to refuse them a Home Office Controlled Drug Licence violates their Article 9 rights to practice their religion.
Fraud Lawyers Association
Criminal Bar Association